![]() |
RONRIDENOUR.COM |
Home |
About Ron Ridenour |
Articles |
Themes |
Poems |
Short stories |
Books |
Links |
Search |
Contact |
Dansk |
Español |
REVIEW: Left to Right, Decline of Communism
in India
[October 24, 2013]
“Left to Right” is a basic reference book that should be read by all practitioners or students of revolution, of socialism-communism, of Marxism.
T.G. Jacob, an Indian scholar and former Maoist activist, has written
a tour de force about the century-long history of India’s many
communist parties. Left to Right, Decline of Communism in India’s
main contribution is its description and analysis of these parties’
failures and it does so without stooping to anti-communism or in pandering
to the capitalist class. (1)
Jacob’s well researched book is honest, courageous, and challenging.
Nor does he beat around the bush. Jacob contends that the “dismal
failure” and decline of most communist parties into social democracy
is partly a consequence of colonised mindsets that facilitated communists
to become lackeys of the Soviet-led Comintern and the British Communist
party.
In the 1960s, the original Communist Party of India (CPI), founded in
1920, split into two, then three and four parties. The latter were variation
of Maoists, who denounced parliamentary politics, the forte of the CPI.
Many Maoist groups engaged in armed struggle in the mid-1960s to the
mid-1970s (with a rebirth in recent years). While most Maoists who survived
mass slaughter have not degenerated into social democratic reformists
of the capitalist system, they too religiously followed a foreign idol,
Mao Tse-tung instead of Lenin or Stalin. Maoists also fell into the
alienating national game of god-hero worshiping and did so without vigorously
analyzing their own country’s conditions, a requirement needed
to shape any national program for socialist revolution.
In some states, especially Kerala and West Bengal where Communist parties
gained such popularity that they won state power, they did not dismantle
the economic power of capitalist enterprise nor radically change the
political structures. In fact, they continued the system of plantations
and the market economy that requires exploitation of the working class
plus demands oppression of castes.
To understand why the various communist parties have failed so dismally,
Jacob points out that the communist leaderships have mainly come from
the upper Brahmin caste with its standard hereditary privileges. Additionally,
communist leaders of the non-Maoist communist parties accepted the illusionary
notion of the “unitary” all-India.
“The present political structure of India is a colonial legacy
put in place in the interests of the colonial bourgeoisie…in alliance
with the feudal casteist vested interests in the countryside...The nationality
question in this country of sub-continental dimensions is probably the
most serious threat to the ruling classes [and] the communists accepted
without dissent the unitary Constitution that paid lip service to federalism…the
communist approach was always a bundle of irreconcilable contradictions.”
(pg. 16-17)
Jacob compares post-colonial India with Lenin’s characterization
of Tsarist Russia: “a prison house of nations”. Thousands
of tribes, hundreds of nationalities and languages, scores of castes
have been discriminated against and largely disregarded or even discarded
by both the bourgeois and leftist parties, with many Maoist groups as
exceptions.
The author also summarizes the rise and fall of Soviet and Chinese communism,
as well as sketching what Marxism is, including some of its theoretical
errors.
A key error for Jacob’s assessment of what went wrong in India
is the Marxist contention that it is scientifically calculable. One
example of “scientific” error is the notion of where working
class socialist revolutions would and would not occur.
Contrary to that “science”, revolutions aimed towards socialism
took place and initially succeeded in some underdeveloped “third
world” countries, instead of in the more industrialized “first
world”, because colonialism prevented full-scale bourgeois democratic
revolutions in the third world.
Other shortcomings that Jacob finds in Marxism, is its neglect to take
both the hearts of humanity, and the rights and needs of Nature into
account. While it seems unfair to criticize Marx for not foreseeing
ecological disasters given the era in which he lived, Leninist, Stalinist,
Maoist and post-Maoist development plans grossly disregarded mother
nature’s needs. Furthermore, most followers of Marxism have turned
a blind eye to the emotional strengths and weaknesses of the human heart,
or as some critics would say, the “spirit”, or to consider
the human touch.
Another disaster for socialist development is the methods that the communist
parties have used to shape and conduct their policies.
”Marxism and communism as an ideological stream originated as
a stream of thinking to facilitate social change, and dogmatism originated
within that system as a deadly anti-thesis blocking further creativity
and development.” (p.29)
“Such a command structure by perpetuating the suppression of dissent
distorts and obstructs the creative potential of human beings (particularly
its members), and it can very fast turn into the anti-thesis of democracy.
Such a monolith scorns the liberationist and humanist essence of Marxism.”
(p. 193)
“Left to Right” also offers a short background of India’s
religious history, including its horrendous caste system. The period
of British colonisation is briefly presented as well. It is truly sad
to see how strongly the coolie mentality hangs fast in India, and how
the classes have long been sub-divided into castes, alienating one from
another, and thereby allowing ruling classes at home and abroad to divide
and conquer nearly at will.
Even though I knew next to nothing about India and its communist parties
what I read here regarding the divisive and domineering role that the
Comintern played, as well as the authoritarian roles played by Maoism
and other communist party leaderships, confirms what I had already discovered
as a follower of Marxism and revolutions, and I learned a good deal
more.
Still it is difficult to understand why these communist parties in India,
and across the world, did not put into practice the “dictatorship
of the proletariat”—true people’s democracy taking
hold on the means of production and decision-making.
I am also left wondering why all these communist parties, and most of
their leaders throughout the world, dissipated or degenerated into partners
with capitalism. More than “just” the fact that capitalism
and its imperialism/globalisation are as powerful as they are, there
must be something about the party approaches and structures, which Jacob
hints at, and the perhaps “natural” inclination to obey-worship
leaderships, that is amiss with communism.
One of the most important factors is the epistemological fact that socialism
can not develop, and that revolutions soon become static, when workers
are not allowed to actually own the means of production, and make important
decisions—promises never implemented. But why have the communist
parties and their leaders failed to prepare workers to take over and
thus create true democracy is a major question still in need of analysis
and answers.
In a reissue, non-India readers of this important book could benefit
from a clearer picture of what the caste system is, perhaps with a summary
of castes and under castes and their functions both in practice and
ideologically. All readers could benefit from a more complete index.
Moreover, Jacob has a tendency to repeat himself a bit much, and some
important terms are introduced without explaining what they mean, or
an explanation appears sometime afterwards. Some terms, such as “social
fascism”, “social imperialism”, are used as curse
words without clarity.
But these are minor complaints. “Left to Right” is a basic
reference book that should be read by all practitioners or students
of revolution, of socialism-communism, of Marxism. The book must find
its way into libraries, universities, and book stores, especially in
India but also throughout the self-styled Commonwealth and the ubiquitous
USA.
(1) Published by Empower India Press, New Delhi, India. Scholars
without Borders, New Delhi, sells “Left to Right” online:
http://www.swb.co.in/store/book/left-right. It is also online at South
Asia Study Centre https://sites.google.com/site/sastudycentre/ , publisher
of Odyssey Publications run by T.G. Jacob and Pranjali Bandu. They have
co-authored several books, including Reflections on the Caste Question,
the Dalit situation in South India, which elucidates this complicated
structure of oppression only cursorily dealt with in “Left to
Right”.
Copyright © 2006-2012 Ronridenour.com